In 1999, in the situation of R. v. Sharpe, British Columbia's highest court struck down a regulation from possessing youngster pornography as unconstitutional.[9] That viewpoint, composed by Justice Duncan Shaw, held, "There is no evidence that demonstrates a major boost in the danger to children because of pornography", and "A https://darkweb10976.newbigblog.com/38724577/what-does-under18porn-mean